Jan Simonsson vs Unknown Player Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Simonsson vs TBD analysis and find out who is favored!
Jan Simonsson vs Unknown Player Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Simonsson 0 - 0 TBD
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Simonsson has won 39.13% of points on their second serve, while TBD has won 41.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Simonsson, in recent form, has won 55.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while TBD has won 50.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.2% and 31.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Simonsson has saved 55.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas TBD has saved 48.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Simonsson has won 20% of matches played (W/L 2/ 8), with TBD winning 24.39% (W/L 100/ 324) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Simonsson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). TBD has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 39% (W/L 24/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 79/ 170).
- Player level: In the last year, Simonsson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 2/ 8), where as TBD has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 24.38% of matches (W/L 98/ 318). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Simonsson has played against opponents with an average rank of 89.8 while TBD has played against players with an average rank of 35.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Simonsson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while TBD has won 49% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Simonsson has converted 61.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and TBD has converted 39.2% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
26% (5-14)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
29% (2-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jan Simonsson vs Unknown Player For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Simonsson VS TBD
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jan Simonsson | Unknown Player |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 29% (2/5) | 33% (1/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 33% (5/10) | 9% (48/506) |
Games Win/Loss | 42% (55/77) | 33% (1661/3415) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 50% (1/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.04 |
Aces Total | 17 | 87 |
DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.08 |
DFs Total | 17 | 198 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 128.29 | 28.16 |
1st Serve % | 66% (226/341) | 61% (2039/3361) |
1st Serve W% | 57% (129/226) | 55% (1120/2039) |
2nd Serve W% | 39% (45/115) | 39% (510/1322) |
BPs Won% Total | 62% (16/26) | 37% (94/253) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (130/309) | 35% (1119/3170) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 50% (1/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (1/252) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/36) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 2% (1/47) |
1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (22/0) |
1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 100% (22/22) |
1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (233/1) |
Jan Simonsson Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Jan Simonsson
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nikolaj Katic
Player
Jan Simonsson
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
21%
(
3 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
QF |
Leyton Rivera
Player
Jan Simonsson
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jan Simonsson
Player
Hugo Ljung
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Giorgio Ricca
Player
Jan Simonsson
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jan Simonsson
Player
Igor Dudun
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Michael Shaw
Player
Jan Simonsson
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
4
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Oskar Jansson
Player
Jan Simonsson
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Unknown Player Recent Matches Played
view more
Simonsson Vs TBD Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Simonsson are available here and TBD photos here.